This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.

478
Effects of Administration of Prostaglandin F2α 7 Days Prior to Initiation of the 7-Day CO-Synch + Cidr Protocol in Beef Heifers on Estrus Response and Pregnancy Rates

Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Exhibit Hall (Baltimore Convention Center)
Nicky Oosthuizen, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
Luara B. Canal, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
Pedro L. P. Fontes, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
Carla D. Sanford, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
Nicolas DiLorenzo, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
Carl R. Dahlen, Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
George E. Seidel, Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Graham C Lamb, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
To determine the effects of administration of PGF2α (25 mg of dinoprost tromethamine/mL, Lutalyse; Zoetis Animal Health) 7 days prior to the initiation of the 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR fixed-time AI (TAI) protocol, 985 Bos taurus beef heifers were enrolled at 9 locations from April 1 to July 15. Within location, all heifers were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) CONTROL (n = 496); 100 µg injection of GnRH (Factrel; gonadorelin hydrochloride; Zoetis Animal Health) and a controlled internal drug releasing (EAZI-BREED CIDR; 1.38 g of progesterone; Zoetis Animal Health) insert for 7 d [d -7], administration of 25 mg of PGF (Lutalyse, dinoprost tromethamine; Zoetis Animal Health) at CIDR removal [d 0], followed by a second injection of GnRH and fixed-time AI (TAI) 54 ± 2 h later; or 2) PRESYNCH (n = 489); same as CONTROL but heifers received an additional injection of 25 mg of PGF 7 d prior [d -14] to CIDR insertion. Estrotect (Rockway Inc., Spring Valley, WI) estrus detection patches were applied to all heifers on d -14 and were evaluated for estrual activity on d -7. Similarly, estrus alert patches were placed on all heifers on d 0 and evaluated for estrual activity at the time of TAI. Pregnancy was diagnosed via transrectal ultrasonography between 35 and 55 d after TAI to determine the presence of a viable embryo, thereby assessing AI pregnancy rates The percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus between d -14 and d -7 was greater (P < 0.001) for the PRESYNCH (70.3%) than the CONTROL (40.0%) treatment, whereas the percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus between d 0 and TAI was significantly (P < 0.001) greater for the CONTROL (57.9%) than the PRESYNCH (41.4%) treatment. Estrus response rates differed (P < 0.001) among locations. Pregnancy rates to TAI differed (P = 0.023) among locations, however, did not differ (P =0.739) between CONTROL and PRESYNCH treatments (46.7 vs 45.5%, respectively). Final breeding season pregnancy rates did not differ (P = 0.811) between treatments. Therefore, an injection of PGF 7 days prior to initiation of the 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol failed to improve pregnancy rates to TAI in replacement beef heifers.