This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.
638
The Influence of Supplemental Zinc and Ractopamine Hydrochloride on Mineral and Nitrogen Retention of Beef Steers
The Influence of Supplemental Zinc and Ractopamine Hydrochloride on Mineral and Nitrogen Retention of Beef Steers
Tuesday, July 11, 2017: 11:45 AM
310 (Baltimore Convention Center)
The study objective was to determine if N retention was improved with supplemental Zn above NRC concentrations with or without ractopamine hydrochloride (RH) inclusion. Angus crossbred steers (n = 32, 485 ± 57 kg) with Genemax gain scores of 4 or 5 were utilized in a 2x2 factorial arrangement (8 steers/treatment). Steers were blocked by BW to one of two finishing diets with no supplemental Zn (analyzed 32 mg Zn/kg DM; CON) or supranutritional Zn (analyzed 145 mg Zn/kg DM; SUPZN), fed for 56 days and then assigned to RH (Actogain, Zoetis) supplementation strategies of 0 (NORAC) or 300 mg·-1steer·-1d (RAC) fed the last 30 d before harvest. On d 57 (d 1 of RH supplementation), steers (4 groups; 8 steers/group; 2 steers/treatment) were moved to metabolism crates and adapted for 10 d, followed by 5 d of total fecal and urine collection. Total retention of Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, and N were calculated. Data were analyzed as a 2x2 factorial in Proc Mixed of SAS with group as random and steer as the experimental unit. Initial 56 d ADG was not affected by treatment (P = 0.67) but DMI was lesser in SUPZN vs. CON (P < 0.01). No interactions between dietary Zn and RH strategies were noted during collection (P ≥ 0.19). Collection DMI did not differ by treatment (P ≥ 0.23); however, SUPZN intake of Mn and Zn was greatest (P < 0.01). Fecal and urinary excretion of Zn and retention of Mn and Zn were increased in SUPZN vs. CON (P < 0.01); however, Zn retention was not different between RAC and NORAC (P = 0.11). Retention of Cu and Fe were unaffected by treatment (P ≥ 0.85). Urine output and urine N excretion were decreased by RAC (P ≤ 0.05). Nitrogen retention as a percent of total ingested N tended (P = 0.10) to be greater in SUPZN (44.4%) vs. CON (40.0%) and tended (P = 0.06) to be greater in RAC (44.8%) vs. NORAC (39.7%). Using Proc Corr, Zn and N retention were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.48, P < 0.01). Average daily gain and G:F across the 86 d trial were increased in RAC vs. NORAC (P < 0.01). Overall, SUPZN appears to improve N retention, suggesting that increasing dietary Zn may be important for cattle growth beyond that induced by RH.