This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.

174
Multivariate Analysis of Beef Cattle Pulmonary Arterial Pressures Measured at Differing Elevations

Monday, July 10, 2017: 2:30 PM
315 (Baltimore Convention Center)
Miranda M Culbertson, Colorado State University, Department of Animal Sciences, Fort Collins, CO
Milton G. Thomas, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Lee L Leachman, Leachman Cattle of Colorado, Fort Collins, CO
R. Mark Enns, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Scott E. Speidel, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
ABSTRACT: Cattle living at altitudes greater than 1,500 m are susceptible to the development of high altitude disease (HAD) and a higher risk of death. Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) is used as an indicator of an animal’s susceptibility to HAD. Measurements of PAP on cattle at lower elevations are generally considered less reliable indicators of HAD when compared to measurements taken at higher elevations, yet little evidence has been published evaluating this relationship. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate PAP measurements from high and low elevations using a multivariate approach. We hypothesized that PAP measurements from lower elevations have a less than perfect relationship to PAP measurements from high elevations. Data collected from 2009 to 2017, was obtained from a multi-breed seedstock database that included PAP measurements and associated information (i.e. PAP testing date and elevation). Average PAP measurement was 44.08 ± 10.75 mmHg, with minimum and maximum observations of 32 and 149 mmHg, respectively. The age when PAP measurements were taken ranged from nine to 21 months with an average age of 15.9 2.8 months. Elevation ranged from 1,555 m to 2,407 m with a bimodal distribution. Therefore, animals with PAP measurements from elevations above 2,000 m were classified as high elevation (HPAP; n=1369) and animals with PAP measurements below 2,000 m were considered low elevation (LPAP; n=1243). A two-trait animal model was used to estimate genetic parameters and EBV for both LPAP and HPAP traits. The model contained the fixed effects of degree of outcross, breed percent and PAP age as covariates; sex and contemporary group (PAP date and yearling management combined) categories. Breed effects were included as covariates of breed percentages for Angus, Charolais, South Devon, Gelbvieh, Simmental and “Other” breeds. Animal was included as a random effect and a 3-generation pedigree consisting of 11,573 animals was used. Heritability for LPAP and HPAP were 0.26 ± 0.08 and 0.37 ± 0.10, respectively, with a genetic correlation of 0.79 ± 0.23. Sire EBV for HPAP were regressed on corresponding sire EBV for LPAP resulting in a regression coefficient of 0.705 ± 0.002 (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that a strong relationship exists between LPAP and HPAP, but the relationship is not perfect. The high genetic correlation between the traits suggest that measurements taken at lower elevations can still serve as an indicator of PAP measurements collected at higher elevations.