This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.
248
Validating the Stage of Maturity at Harvest for Barley, Oat, and Triticale for Swath Grazing
Validating the Stage of Maturity at Harvest for Barley, Oat, and Triticale for Swath Grazing
Sunday, July 9, 2017: 11:30 AM
317 (Baltimore Convention Center)
The objective was to determine the effect of harvest maturity (SOM) for barley, oat, and triticale on grazing days, nutrient composition, DMI, cow rib and rump fat, and production costs. Three 16-ha fields were seeded to either: barley (Hordeum vulgare; cv. CDC Maverick); oat (Avena sativa; cv. CDC SO1); or triticale (Triticosecale; cv. Taza). Each forage was cut at an early (EAL; late milk for oat and soft dough for barley and triticale) and late (LAT; hard dough) SOM. One hundred twenty Angus cows (640 kg ±1.13 kg) were randomly allocated to 1 of the 6 replicated (n=3) treatments and allowed to graze the paddock (3-d forage allocations) until all forage had been allocated. Cow BW (conceptus adjusted), and rib and rump fat were measured at the start and end of the study. Forage DM yield was determined using randomly sampled 0.25-m2 quadrats of pre-swath biomass and regrowth biomass. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design with a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, using the mixed model of SAS. Forage yield for EAL and LAT oat, barley, and triticale were (kg/ha) 7,634, 8,240, 8,242, 7,372, 8,773, and 11,080, respectively. Grazing days increased from 50 to 89 d for LMO to HDO; however, there were no effects of SOM for barley or triticale (crop type × SOM interaction, P < 0.01). Crude protein differed by crop type with barley (12.1%) having greater (P < 0.01) CP than oat (11.0%) and triticale (11.4%). Harvesting at more advanced maturity decreased CP (12.1 vs. 11.0%, P < 0.01) and TDN (58 vs. 51%, P < 0.01). Crop type (P = 0.19) and maturity (P = 0.36) did not affect BW change. However, the change in rib fat (mm) was greater (P < 0.01) for oat (0.43 mm), than barley (-0.27) and triticale (-0.15). Cows fed EAL oat increased rump fat while LAT oat decreased: no change in rump fat was observed for other crops (crop × maturity, P = 0.01). Cows fed LAT oat had greater DMI than EAL oat (13.0 vs. 6.0 kg/d), but intake did not differ among the other treatments averaging 9.5 kg/d (crop × maturity, P = 0.01). Cost ranged from $1.16/cow/d for LAT triticale to $2.43/cow/d for EAL oat. The results of this study suggest that harvesting whole crop annuals at a later SOM, may improve yield and reduce costs without negative effects on animal performance.