This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.

242
Performance Response of Piglets to Acid-Preserved High Moisture Wheat or Barley As an Alternative to in-Feed Acidification.

Sunday, July 9, 2017: 10:00 AM
317 (Baltimore Convention Center)
Danilo Sotto, Jr., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Denise Beaulieu, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Two experiments were conducted to compare the effectiveness of acidified high moisture wheat or barley in the diet of weanling pigs as an alternative to in-feed acidification. Wheat or barley were stored for 34 or 38 days, respectively, following reconstitution to 20% moisture and the addition of the appropriate acid (propionic acid or a commercial acidifier with 30-50% phosphoric acid). Weight loss of galvanized and carbon steel coupons, embedded in the acidified grain, were used to estimate corrosion rate. Trial 1 (wheat) and trial 2 (barley) used 160 and 90 pigs respectively (weaned at 21±2 days, 6.50 to 6.70 kg BW, housed 4 pigs/pen). Pigs were fed stage 1 and 2 treatment diets from day 0 to 7, and 8 to 21 respectively, and a common commercial diet from day 22 to 35. The treatments in trial 1, arranged as a 2x2 factorial, were type of acid (propionic or phosphoric) and application method (wheat preservation or diet supplementation) plus a negative control (5 treatments). The 3 treatments in trial 2 were phosphoric acid applied either as barley preservation or diet supplementation, plus a negative control. Mold was observed on phosphoric acid-preserved wheat and barley (7,000 and 820,000 cfu/gram respectively), however, mycotoxin levels were below acceptable limits. During storage, the pH of phosphoric acid-preserved wheat and barley increased from 4.27 to 5.72 and 4.60 to 5.47 respectively, while the pH of propionic acid-preserved wheat increased from 4.56 to 4.85. In trial 1, treatment had no effect on ADG or ADFI (P>0.05) but G:F (0.78 negative control vs 0.84 propionic acid) was improved in stage 2 in pigs fed diets with propionic acid, regardless of application method (P<0.05). Treatment had no effect on ADG, ADFI or G:F in trial 2 (P>0.05). Corrosion rate was higher with propionic than phosphoric acid on carbon steel but not galvanized steel (acid x coupon interaction, P<0.05). Regardless of acid, a higher corrosion rate was observed on galvanized steel than carbon steel (P <0.05). In conclusion, propionic acid addition to weanling pig diets improved G:F and wheat preserved with propionic acid provided comparable feed efficiency benefits to diet supplementation with the acid. Phosphoric acid in wheat or barley-based diets did not affect piglet performance and requires further investigation as a grain preservative. Furthermore, a higher corrosion rate can be expected if propionic acid preserved grains are stored in bins made of galvanized steel.