This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.

485
Impacts of Estrus Expression and Intensity during a Fixed-Time AI Protocol on Parameters Associated with Fertility and Pregnancy Success in Beef Cows

Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Exhibit Hall (Baltimore Convention Center)
Reinaldo F. Cooke, Oregon State University - EOARC Burns, Burns, OR
Adnan Darin Pereira Rodrigues, UNESP - FMVZ, Botucatu, Brazil
Rafael S Cipriano, UniSalesiano, Araçatuba, Brazil
Luis Gustavo T da Silva, UNESP - FMVZ, Botucatu, Brazil
Ronaldo L.A. Cerri, Applied Animal Biology, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Leandro H Cruppe, Select Sires Inc, Plain City, OH
Mauro Meneghetti, Zoetis, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Ky G. Pohler, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Jose L.M. Vasconcelos, Department of Animal Production, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
In this experiment (d 0 to 41), 290 lactating, primiparous and multiparous non-pregnant Brangus cows received a 2 mg injection of estradiol benzoate and an intravaginal progesterone (P4) releasing device (CIDR) on d 0, a 12.5 mg injection of PGF on d 7, CIDR removal in addition to 0.6 mg injection of estradiol cypionate and 300 IU injection of eCG on d 9, and fixed-time AI on d 11. All cows were inseminated by the same technician with semen from a single bull. On d 7, cows were fitted with a pedometer behind their left shoulder. On d 9, an estrus detection patch was attached to the tailhed of each cow. On d 11, estrus was defined as removal of >50% of the rub-off coating from the patch. Cow activity (total steps) was calculated by subtracting d 7 to 9 results (basal activity) from d 9 to 11 results (expected estrus period). Cows were classified by estrus intensity according to physical activity as: NOESTRUS = cows that did not express estrus; or cows that expressed estrus with physical activity below (LOWESTRUS) or above (HIESTRUS) the population median. Ovarian transrectal ultrasonography was performed on d 11 and 18. Blood was collected concurrently with ultrasonography exams for plasma P4 analysis. Pregnancy status was verified by transrectal ultrasonography on d 41. Only data from cows that ovulated to the synchronization protocol and that were successfully classified according to estrus characteristics were utilized (NOESTRUS, n = 57; LOWESTRUS, n = 87; HIESTRUS, n = 90). Diameter of dominant follicle on d 11, CL volume on d 18, and plasma P4 concentrations on d 18 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in HIESTRUS vs. LOWESTRUS and NOESTRUS, and also greater (P ≤ 0.05) for LOWESTRUS vs. NOESTRUS (14.1, 13.4, and 12.5 mm, SEM = 0.3; 5.5, 4.9, and 3.6 cm3, SEM = 0.5; and 4.7, 4.0, and 3.0 ng/mL; SEM = 0.2). Plasma P4 on d 11 were greater (P < 0.01) in NOESTRUS vs. HIESTRUS and LOWESTRUS, and similar (P = 0.36) between HIESTRUS and LOWESTRUS (0.47, 0.30, and 0.25 ng/mL; SEM = 0.07). Pregnancy rates were less (P ≤ 0.04) in NOESTRUS vs. HIESTRUS and LOWESTRUS, and similar (P = 0.38) between HIESTRUS and LOWESTRUS (42.0, 67.3 and 60.5, SEM = 7.1). Hence, estrus expression and intensity, estimated by physical activity after CIDR removal, impacted fertility parameters and pregnancy success in Brangus cows.