1937
Dietary supplementation with organic or inorganic selenium and pyridoxine in gilts on gene expression in the porcine expanded blastocysts in vivo

Monday, July 21, 2014
Exhibit Hall AB (Kansas City Convention Center)
Danyel Bueno Dalto , Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Stephen Tsoi , Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Isabelle Audet , Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Michael Dyck , Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
J. Jacques Matte , Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Abstract Text: This study aimed to determine the effect of dietary selenium (Se) and pyridoxine supplementation, in gilts, on gene expression in the porcine expanded blastocyst (PEB). Eighteen gilts were randomly assigned to one of the 3 experimental diets: 1) basal diet (natural Se content of 0.2 mg/kg) without supplemental Se or pyridoxine (CONT, n=6); 2) basal diet + 0.3 mg/kg of feed of sodium selenite, and 10 mg/kg of feed of hydrochloride pyridoxine  (MSeB610, n=6); and 3) basal diet + 0.3 mg/kg of feed of Se-enriched yeast, and 10 mg/kg of feed of hydrochloride pyridoxine (OSeB610, n=6). All gilts were inseminated at their fifth estrus, and sacrificed 5 days after. Both uterine horns were flushed for embryo harvesting. Expanded blastocysts were selected for the porcine embryo-specific microarray: direct comparisons were done for MSeB610 vs CONT and OSeB610 vs CONT, whereas a reference design comparison were used for OSeB610 vs MSeB610. Data were analyzed according to a randomized arrangement of treatments in blocks with the 3 dietary treatments as the main independent variables. Microarray data were analyzed using FlexArray, with threshold fold change ≥ 1.7 and P-value ≤ 0.05. CONT had lower blood Se concentration than Se-supplemented gilts (P<0.01), but no differences were found between Se sources (P=0.38). CONT had lower pyridoxine concentrations than B610 gilts (P<0.05). Plasma glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity tended to increase during the experimental period (P<0.06), but no treatment effect was detected (P=0.57). MSeB610 vs CONT and OSeB610 vs CONT respectively showed 24 and 446 differentially expressed genes, whereas the corresponding number was 190 for OSeB610 vs MSeB610. No specific biological processes were affected using Gorilla gene list analysis in MSeB610, however OSeB610 stimulated protein folding but not selenoprotein synthesis. Although all associated genes for GSH-Px and other selenoprotein synthesis were found, none of them were differentially expressed in any comparison. Antioxidant genes such as glutaredoxin-3 (GLRX3), peroxiredoxin-4 (PRDX4) and coenzyme Q6 monooxygenase (COQ6) were up-regulated in OSeB610 vs CONT, and thioredoxin and thioredoxin domain containing 17 were down-regulated in OSeB610 vs CONT and OSeB610 vs MSeB610, respectively. GLRX3, PRDX4 and COQ6 expression were validated by real-time PCR. In conclusion, OSeB610 affects PEB metabolism more markedly than MSeB610. Although supplements of both Se sources and pyridoxine did not influence GSH-Px-related genes expression in the PEB, they are involved with other antioxidant enzymes regulating antioxidant defense and cell proliferation, at this stage.

Keywords: porcine embryo, selenium, gene expression