73
Enhancement of the acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide in feedlot steers supplemented with OmniGen-AF

Monday, July 21, 2014: 4:15 PM
2502 (Kansas City Convention Center)
Nicole C. Burdick Sanchez , USDA-ARS, Livestock Issues Research Unit, Lubbock, TX
Joe O Buntyn , University of Nebraska, Department of Animal Science, Lincoln, NE
Jeffery A. Carroll , USDA-ARS, Livestock Issues Research Unit, Lubbock, TX
Troy Wistuba , Prince AgriProducts Inc., Quincy, IL
Kevin DeHaan , Prince AgriProducts Inc., Quincy, IL
Sara E Sieren , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Steven J. Jones , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Ty B. Schmidt , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Abstract Text:

This study was designed to determine the effect of supplementing feedlot steers with OmniGen-AF on the acute phase response to a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge.  Steers (n=18; 270±5 kg BW) were separated into two treatment groups (n=9/treatment): one group was fed a standard receiving diet (Control, Cont) and the other group was fed the same receiving diet supplemented with OmniGen-AF at 4 g/45.4 kg BW for 29d (OmniGen-AF).  On d27 steers were fitted with indwelling jugular cannulas and rectal temperature (RT) monitoring devices and placed in individual stalls.  On d28, steers were challenged i.v. with LPS (0.5 µg/kg BW at 0 h). Sickness behavior scores (SBS) and two whole blood samples were collected at 30-min intervals from -2 to 8h relative to the challenge at 0h.  One vacutainer containing EDTA was collected for complete blood cell count (CBC) analysis, and the second was collected in 9-mL monovette serum tube; after collection serum was isolated and stored at -80oC until analyzed for cortisol and cytokine concentrations. Rectal temperature, SBS, and cortisol were affected by time (P<0.001).  Prior to the challenge, RT was greater (P<0.001) in Cont steers (39.31±0.03oC) than OmniGen-AF steers (39.14±0.03oC).  Therefore, post-challenge RT was analyzed as the change in response from baseline values.  The change in RT relative to baseline values increased (P<0.001) in both groups in response to LPS challenge, but was not affected by treatment (P=0.49). Sickness behavior scores increased (P<0.001) after LPS challenge and tended (P=0.09) to be greater in Control (1.57±0.02) than OmniGen-AF steers (1.51±0.02).  Cortisol concentrations were affected by treatment (P=0.005) and time (P<0.001).  For both groups, cortisol increased (P<0.001) in response to LPS challenge.  Cortisol was greater in Cont (29.2±0.9 ng/mL) than OmniGen-AF steers (25.5±0.9 ng/mL). White blood cell and lymphocyte concentrations were greater (P≤0.004) in Cont than OmniGen-AF steers throughout the study.  Neutrophils were decreased (P = 0.04) in Cont steers (0.7±0.2 K/uL) compared to OmniGen-AF steers (1.3±0.2 K/uL) prior to the LPS challenge.  There was a treatment (P≤0.02) and time (P<0.001) effect for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and interferon-γ (IFNγ). Specifically, TNFα and IFNγ concentrations increased (P<0.001) in response to LPS challenge.  Furthermore, concentrations of TNFα and IFNγ were decreased in (P≤0.02) in Cont steers compared to OmniGen-AF steers.  These data suggest that OmniGen-AF supplementation served to prime the immune system prior to the LPS challenge, allowing for an enhanced response to LPS challenge.

Keywords: cattle, immune response, OmniGen-AF