Some abstracts do not have video files because ASAS was denied recording rights.

1203
Grazing management and farm greenhouse gas emission intensity of beef production systems

Wednesday, July 20, 2016: 11:15 AM
151 E/F (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Aklilu W Alemu , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Henry Janzen , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Shannan Little , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Xiying Hao , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Don Thompson , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Vern Baron , Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada
Alan D. Iwaasa , Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK, Canada
Karen A. Beauchemin , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Roland Kröbel , Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Abstract Text:

The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of grazing management on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity at the farm-gate for beef production systems in western Canada using life cycle analysis. A life cycle analysis over an 8-year period was conducted on a beef farm that managed 120 cows, 4 bulls, and their progeny. Calves were stocked on pasture and market cattle were finished on grain for 136 d. Four grazing management systems were evaluated: i) light continuous grazing (LC), ii) heavy continuous grazing (HC), iii) light continuous grazing for the cow-calf pairs and moderate deferred-rotational grazing for the stocker cattle (LCDR), and iv) heavy continuous grazing for the cow-calf pairs and moderate deferred-rotational grazing for the stocker cattle (HCDR). Primary data for pasture quality, animal performance and soil were from short- and long-term grazing studies. GHG emissions from different sources within the farm were estimated using the whole-farm model, Holos. Soil carbon change related to the different grazing managements was estimated using the Introductory Carbon Balance Model. Emissions intensity of beef varied among grazing management strategies and ranged between 14.4-15.9 kg CO2e kg-1 live weight. Emissions intensity decreased with increasing stocking rate where the LC management had 9% greater GHG emission intensity than the HC treatment (14.4 kg CO2e kg-1 live weight). There was no difference in emission intensity estimates between LC and LCDR or between HC and HCDR, indicating that the use of moderate deferred-rotational grazing for the stocker operation in LCDR and HCDR has no effect on emission intensity. However, the LCDR management had 7% greater emission intensity than HCDR (14.5 kg CO2e kg-1 live weight). Regardless of the grazing management, methane emission from enteric fermentation was the major contributor (67-68%) followed by nitrous oxide from manure management (14-16%). Similarly, in all the grazing managements, emissions from the cow-calf herd were the major contributor (68-70%) for the total farm GHG emissions. When soil carbon sequestration was included into the total farm emissions, intensity estimate was reduced by 25-30% and were similar among the grazing management scenarios. Overall, the outcome from our study emphasizes the impact of grazing management on farm emissions as well as the importance of accounting for all the emission sources and sinks within the beef production system while estimating its environmental footprint.

 Keywords: Grazing management, Life cycle analysis, Soil carbon