Some abstracts do not have video files because ASAS was denied recording rights.
8
Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance vaccine efficacy, health, and performance of feedlot cattle
Altering the time of vaccination against respiratory pathogens to enhance vaccine efficacy, health, and performance of feedlot cattle
Wednesday, July 20, 2016: 11:15 AM
258/259 (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Abstract Text: Ninety Angus × Hereford calves were ranked by gender, BW, and age, and assigned to 1 of 3 vaccination schemes against respiratory pathogens: 1) vaccination at weaning (d 0) and at feedlot entry (d 30; CON, n = 30), 2) vaccination 15 d before weaning (d -15) and 15 d before feedlot entry (d 15; EARLY, n = 30), and 3) vaccination 15 d after weaning (d 15) and 15 d after feedlot entry (d 45; DELAYED, n = 30). From d -15 to 6, calves were maintained on pasture. On d 7, calves were placed according to treatments into 1 of 18 drylot pens (6 pens/treatment; 5 calves/pen), and fed a forage-based preconditioning diet. On d 30, calves were transported 1,440 km in a livestock trailer and returned to different drylot pens for a 45-d receiving period. Calves were fed a forage + concentrate diet during the receiving period. Blood samples and BW were collected on d -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75. Additional BW was collected on the day after blood sampling so 2 consecutive BW were recorded and averaged. There were no treatment effects on BW pre-weaning, weaning, or during the preconditioning and receiving periods (P ≥ 0.59). The EARLY calves had less (P ≤ 0.05) ADG pre-weaning, however had greater (P ≤ 0.04) ADG during feedlot receiving compared to the other treatments. During preconditioning, CON had greater (P = 0.05) DMI compared with EARLY and DELAYED calves, but there were treatment effects (P ≥ 0.20) on DMI during the feedlot receiving. There were no treatment effects (P ≥ 0.16) on G:F, morbidity, or mortality. By 15-d after initial vaccination, DELAYED calves had the greatest (P < 0.01) antibody titers against Mannheimia haemolytica, and EARLY calves had the lowest (P ≤ 0.05) antibody titer against this pathogen. By revaccination, there was no difference (P = 0.82) between DELAYED or CON for antibody titers against M. haemolytica titers, while EARLY titers remained the lowest (P < 0.01). However, by 45-d after initial vaccination, EARLY calves had the greatest antibody titers (P ≤ 0.05) against M. haemolytica, which remained the greatest until 60-d after initial vaccination. These data suggest that while pre-weaning ADG may be inhibited by vaccination before weaning, vaccination before weaning and revaccination before feedlot receiving can improve overall antibody titer to M. haemolyticaand ADG during feedlot receiving.
Keywords: feeder cattle, health, performance, vaccination