Some abstracts do not have video files because ASAS was denied recording rights.

268
Impact of heifer development system on subsequent ADG and reproduction in two different breeding seasons

Friday, July 22, 2016: 10:45 AM
150 B/C (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Shelby A. Springman , University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
Hazy R. Nielson , University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
Rick N Funston , University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
Abstract Text:

A 4-yr study was conducted to determine the impact of heifer development system on subsequent growth and reproductive performance in 2 breeding seasons. In Exp. 1, March-born, crossbred (5/8 Red Angus, 3/8 Continental; n = 225) heifers were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 post-weaning nutritional treatments (2 pastures·treatment-1·year-1) from mid-January to mid-April. Heifers were offered ad libitum meadow hay (HAY) and 1.81 kg/d (29% CP, DM) supplement or allowed to graze meadow (MDW) and offered 0.45 kg/d supplement. Heifers were managed as a single herd prior to and following treatment. Heifers were synchronized with a single PG injection 5 d after being placed with bulls for a 45 d breeding season. HAY heifers had greater (P = 0.01) ADG during the treatment period than MDW heifers (0.77 vs. 0.51 ± 0.03 kg/d; HAY, MDW). At pregnancy diagnosis, HAY heifers tended to have greater BW compared with MDW heifers (P = 0.06; 377 vs. 367 ± 3 kg; HAY, MDW). Percent of mature BW prior to the breeding season was greater (P = 0.02) for HAY compared with MDW (58% vs. 55% ± 1%; HAY, MDW). Pregnancy rates were similar for HAY and MDW heifers (P = 0.97, 88 ± 4%). In Exp. 2, May-born, crossbred (5/8 Red Angus, 3/8 Continental; n = 258) heifers were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to HAY or MDW treatments. Similar to Exp. 1, heifers on HAY treatment had greater (P = 0.01) ADG during the treatment period (0.63 vs. 0.39 ± 0.03 kg/d; HAY, MDW), resulting in greater pre-breeding BW (P = 0.02) for HAY heifers compared with MDW heifers (320 vs. 305 ± 3 kg, respectively). At pregnancy diagnosis, BW was similar (P = 0.16) between treatments (368 vs. 356 ± 4 kg; HAY, MDW). Percent of mature BW prior to the breeding season was greater (P = 0.02) for HAY (58%) compared with MDW (54%). Pregnancy rates were similar (P = 0.44) between treatments (72 vs. 68 ± 4%; HAY, MDW). Heifer development system did not impact pregnancy rate in the March or May replacement heifers; however, March heifer pregnancy rate was greater (P < 0.01) than May (87 vs. 70 ± 3%). The lower pregnancy rate in May heifers may be due to declining forage quality during the breeding season.

Keywords: beef heifer, calving date, heifer development