239
Impact of harvest weight on the relative growth performance and carcass characteristics of progeny of two swine sire lines
Impact of harvest weight on the relative growth performance and carcass characteristics of progeny of two swine sire lines
Monday, March 16, 2015
Grand Ballroom - Posters (Community Choice Credit Union Convention Center)
Abstract Text: The relative performance of the progeny of 2 sire lines was evaluated with a total of 2784 pigs in a commercial wean-to-finish facility to determine the impact of sire line and gender on growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs sent for harvest at 4 harvest weights (111, 125, 138, and 145 kg). Separate studies were conducted within each harvest weight (HW); each study used a RCBD with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: 1) Sire Line (A vs. B) and 2) Gender (Barrows vs. Gilts). Pigs were housed from weaning (6.7 ± 0.31 kg BW) to the respective HW in groups of 29 with ad libitum access to feed and water. Within each HW, pigs were sent for harvest in 4 groups over a 5-wk period at a commercial facility and standard carcass grading measures were collected. Final pen mean BW for the 4 studies were 111.1 ± 2.95, 122.0 ± 2.23; 134.5 ± 2.56, and 141.6 ± 2.63 kg, respectively. Barrows had greater (P < 0.05) overall ADG and ADFI, and 10th rib backfat depth but similar (P > 0.05) overall G: F than gilts at all HW. The two sire lines had similar (P > 0.05) ADG at the 2 lighter HW; Line A grew faster (P = 0.004) than Line B at HW of 138 kg (22.7 g/d) and tended to grow faster (P = 0.09) at HW of 145 kg (13.6 g/d). Line A had lower (P < 0.05) ADFI than Line B at the 2 lighter HW [1.83 vs. 1.87 kg/d (SEM 0.028) at 111 kg; 1.92 vs. 1.97 kg/d (SEM 0.035) at 125 kg] but at the 2 heavier HW there was no difference (P > 0.05) between the lines for ADFI. Line A had greater (P < 0.05) G:F than Line B at all HW except at 138 kg HW, where there was no difference (P > 0.05) between the lines. Carcass yield was lower (P < 0.05) for Line A than B at the 2 heavier HW [74.8 vs. 75.2 % (SEM 0.15) at 138 kg HW; 74.8 vs. 75.5 % (SEM 0.10) at 145 kg HW]; however, at the 2 lighter HW the lines had similar (P > 0.05) carcass yield. Line A had lower (P < 0.05) 10th rib backfat depth but similar (P > 0.05) Longissimusmuscle depth at all HW. These results suggest that when evaluating sire lines for growth and carcass characteristics the final BW can influence the difference between the lines.
Keywords:
Pig, sire line, harvest weight