117
Effects of Floor Cooling on Late Lactation Sows Under Acute Heat Stress

Wednesday, March 15, 2017: 8:30 AM
Grand Ballroom South (Century Link Center)
Francisco A Cabezon , Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Allan P. Schinckel , Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Jeremy N. Marchant-Forde , USDA-ARS Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN
Jay S. Johnson , USDA-ARS Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN
Robert M Stwalley , Department of Agricultural Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

The objective was to evaluate the effects of floor cooling on late lactation sows under severe summer heat stress. Ten multiparous sows were provided with a cooling pad built with an aluminum plate surface, high-density polyethylene base and copper pipes. Treatments were randomly allotted to sows to receive a constant cool water flow of 0.00 (CONTROL, n = 4), 0.25 (LOW, n = 2), 0.55 (MEDIUM, n = 2) or 0.85 (HIGH, n = 2) l/min for 100 min. The cooling was initiated 1 h after the room reached 35ºC. Respiration rates (RR), vaginal temperature (VT) and skin temperature (ST, 15 cm posterior to the ear) were recorded before the trial, prior to cooling, and 5 times (every 20 min) after the cooling phase started. Rectal temperature (RT) was recorded before the trial, prior to cooling and in the last 20 min of cooling. Water flow rates, inlet and outlet water temperatures were recorded 5 times (every 20 min) to calculate heat removal (watts) after the cooling initiation. The same procedure was repeated 8 times (2 times/day for 4 days). In each repetition treatments were switched randomly. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS. For the pre-trial and pre-cooling RR, VT, RT and ST measurements, the model included treatment as fixed effect and repetition as a random block. During the cooling phase, RR, VT and ST, and heat removal were analyzed using repeated measures with sow as a repeated random effect. The model included treatment, cooling time and their interactions as fixed effects. The mean room temperature and relative humidity during the trial were 35.1 ± 0.4ºC and 68.4 ± 3.2%, respectively. The interaction of treatment by cooling time impacted (P < 0.004) RR and VT. The treatments impacted RR, VT, ST and RT (ºC) after 80 min of cooling (P < 0.001), mean RR’s were 122a, 76b, 67bc and 45c breaths/min, mean VT’s were 40.1a, 39.5b, 39.4b and 39.2b, mean RT’s were 40.0a, 39.5b, 39.2bc and 39.0c, and ST’s were 39.4a, 39.0ab, 38.9ab and 38.6b for the CONTROL, LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH treatment, respectively (superscripts different at P < 0.05). Overall heat removal during the trial was 193a, 321b and 365b watts for the LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH treatments, respectively (P < 0.001). Cooling pads with LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH water flow rates reduced RR, RT and VT in lactating sows.