170
Comparing the Effects of Butyric Acid Source and Level on Growth Performance of Nursery Pigs

Monday, March 13, 2017
Grand Ballroom Foyer (Century Link Center)
Kiah M. Gourley , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Jason C Woodworth , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Joel M DeRouchey , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Mike D Tokach , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Robert D Goodband , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Steve S. Dritz , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
A total of 400 nursery pigs(PIC 19×1050 or PIC 3×C 29 initially 6.2 ± 0.01 kg) were used to compare the effects of increasing levels of two encapsulated butyric acid sources on growth performance of nursery pigs. Dietary treatments were arranged as a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with main effects of butyric acid source (ButiPEARL vs. ButiPEARLZ; Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA) and acid source level (low (0.05 or 0.07%) vs. high (0.10 or 0.14%), for ButiPEARL or ButiPEARLZ, respectively) plus a control diet without butyric acid. The addition of butyric acid was established such that the same amount of butyric acid was contributed from each source for the low or high levels, respectively. Experimental diets were fed in 3 phases from d 0 to 7, 7 to 21, and 21 to 42. Pens of pigs were balanced by initial BW and randomly allotted to treatments, with 8 pens/treatment. From d 0 to 7, a source × level interaction (P<0.05) was observed for ADG, ADFI, and G:F with pigs fed diets containing ButiPEARL having improved performance at the low inclusion, with those fed the high level not different from the control. However, pigs fed ButiPEARLZ had similar performance to the control regardless of level. In Phase 2 (d 7 to 21), ADG and ADFI were not influenced by butyric acid source or level, but an interaction (P=0.002) was observed for G:F as pigs fed ButiPEARL had poorer G:F as level increased; whereas pigs fed increasing ButiPEARLZ had improved G:F. For Phase 3 (d 21 to 42), increasing either butyric acid source tended (P=0.060) to decrease ADG. Overall (d 0 to 42), butyric acid source or level did not affect ADG, ADFI or G: F. In conclusion, this study showed that pigs fed low ButiPEARL in Phase 1 (d 0 to 7) had improved growth performance compared to other treatments with only minor treatment effects observed thereafter.

ButiPEARL

ButiPEARLZ

P<

Item

Control

Low

High

Low

 High

SEM

Source × level

Source

Level

d 0 to 71

ADG, g

108b

139a

107b

89b

109b

7.68

0.002

0.003

0.413

G:F, g/kg

 767ab

833a

 729b

687b

766ab

6.20

0.007

0.096

0.711

d 0 to 42

ADG, g

481

470

456

452

446

8.88

0.693

0.130

0.260

G:F, g/kg

719

712

709

717

707

5.90

0.633

0.796

0.267

1Source × level interaction (P<0.05)