89
The Effects of Hydroponic Wheat Fodder on Fecal Metabolites in Equines

Monday, March 13, 2017: 2:00 PM
210/211 (Century Link Center)
Jesse M. Francis , Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
Grace C. Handlos , Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
Gary A. Apgar , Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
Erin B. Venable , Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
The use of hydroponic feeding systems for horses has gained popularity during recent years. Typically, this feeding system allows for a more efficient use of the whole plant, including the shoot, root, and seed remnants rather than traditional grazing in which only the shoot of the plant is consumed. Vertical systems have practical uses in largely developed areas where traditional forage sources are limited, in arid countries or in areas with severe droughts where forage growth is minimal. Though there is some research on fodder utilization in production animals, there are currently no published data on the effects of fodder in horses. Our study, approved by the Southern Illinois University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#13-043) utilized eight Quarter Horse mares randomly assigned to one of two diets. Control (C) horses were offered 2% of their body weight in hay (DM basis) and Fodder (F) horses received 1% of their body weight in hay (DM basis) and 1% of their body weight in fresh wheat fodder (AF Basis) twice daily. Body weight and hoof temperature data were recorded weekly. Fecal samples were collected weekly and analyzed for pH, ammonia, and volatile fatty acid concentration. Hay and fodder samples were also collected weekly to monitor nutrient profiles of the two forage types for the duration of the study. Additionally, nutrient profiles from seed to mature (8 days growth) were developed for treatment F. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using PROC MIXED of SAS (v. 9.4) and significance was established at P < 0.05. Both fecal pH (P ≤ 0.01) and ash content (P <0.0001) were higher for C as compared to F. Isobutyric acid was also significantly (P < 0.05) in F as compared to C. A comparison of the nutrient values of the two forages demonstrated significantly higher DM, ash, NDF, and ADF (P <0.0001) in C while nitrogen, protein, and fat (P <0.0001) were significantly higher in F overall. Daily growth of the fodder decreased DM content (P <0.0001) while ash, NDF, ADF, nitrogen, protein, and fat (P <0.0001) increased as the fodder reached maturity. These results indicate that utilizing fodder affects fecal metabolites associated with digestion.