175
Evaluation of Dietary Phytogenics on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economics of Grow-Finish Pigs Housed Under Commercial Conditions

Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Grand Ballroom Foyer (Century Link Center)
Jose A Soto , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Mike D. Tokach , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Ganapathi Raj Murugesan , BIOMIN America Inc., San Antonio, TX
Steven S. Dritz , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Jason C. Woodworth , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Joel M. DeRouchey , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Robert D. Goodband , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
A total of 1,245 pigs (PIC 327×1050, initially 22.1 kg) were used in a 125-d trial to determine the effects of 2 dietary essential oil mixtures on growth performance, carcass characteristics and economics of finishing pigs. Pens of 27 or 28 pigs were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 9 replications/treatment with treatments fed in 6 phases. Treatment 1 was the control with no feed additives. Treatment 2 contained essential oil mixture 1 (EOM 1) in all phases. Treatment 3 contained EOM 1 fed from phase 3 to 6 and essential oil mixture 2 in all phases (EOM 1+2). Treatment 4 contained EOM 1 in all 6 phases. Treatment 5 contained Ractopamine HCl (RAC) in phase 6. Treatments 1-3 and 4-5 had 12% and 16% CP (0.66 and 0.90 % Standardized ileal digestible Lys, respectively) in phase 6 diets, respectively. Overall (d 0 to 125), pigs fed diets with EOM 1+2 had increased (P=0.003) ADFI compared with pigs fed the control diet. Pigs fed EOM 1 + 16% CP had increased (P=0.032) ADFI compared with pigs fed RAC. Pigs fed RAC had increased (P=0.027) G:F compared with pigs fed EOM 1 + 16% CP. Pigs fed EOM 1+2 had heavier (P<0.05) HCW compared with pigs fed the control treatment or EOM 1 + 12% CP. Pigs fed RAC had reduced (P=0.001) backfat thickness and increased (P=0.001) percentage lean, and greater (P<0.030) income over feed cost (IOFC) compared with pigs fed EOM 1 + 16% CP. In summary, while ADG was not affected in this study, pigs fed RAC had the greatest G:F and IOFC. The addition of EOM 1+2 increased HCW similar to those fed RAC with EOM 1 + 16% CP being intermediate. Additional research to confirm these responses to essential oil additions is warranted.

Phase 6 CP, %

12

16

Feed additive

Control

EOM 11

EOM 1+22

EOM 1

RAC3

SEM

ADG, kg

0.81

0.83

0.83

0.83

0.83

0.014

ADFI, kg

2.19bc

2.23ab

2.27a

2.23ab

2.17c

0.046

G:F

0.373ab

0.375ab

0.368b

0.372b

0.383a

0.026

Final BW, kg

122.7

124.6

124.6

123.8

123.9

2.37

HCW, kg

94.5b

94.8b

97.1a

96.1ab

97.3a

1.34

IOFC, $/pig

65.99ab

64.55b

65.64b

65.45b

67.77a

0.723

Means within a row without a common superscript differ P<0.050.

1Contained caraway, garlic, thyme, and cinnamon as key ingredients.

2Contained oregano, citrus and anise oils as key ingredients.

3Ractopamine HCl.