344
Impact of Corn Oil Removal from Modified Distillers Grains Plus Solubles and Supplemental Corn Oil on Finishing Cattle Performance

Tuesday, March 14, 2017: 10:45 AM
213 (Century Link Center)
Jordan E Burhoop , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
C. J. Bittner , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
F. H. Hilscher , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
M. K. Luebbe , University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE
J. C. MacDonald , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
G. E. Erickson , University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
The effects of added corn oil in distillers grains plus solubles on finishing cattle performance was evaluated utilizing 320 steers (initial BW = 413 kg; SD = 25 kg) fed in 32 pens (10 steers / pen and one of 4 treatments (n = 8 pens / treatment). Cattle were limit fed 5 d prior to starting and weighed on d 0 and 1 for initial BW. The four treatments consisted of a corn control diet (CON), 40% deoiled modified distillers grains plus solubles (Deoiled MDGS), 38% deoiled modified distillers grains plus solubles plus 2% corn oil (MDGS+Oil), and 40% full fat modified distillers grains plus solubles (Full Fat MDGS). The deoiled MDGS product contained 8.9% fat while the full fat MDGS product was 11.6% fat. All MDGS and corn oil were sourced from the same plant. Performance data were based on 134 d and carcass data were collected at slaughter and following a 48-h chill. Data were analyzed using the mixed procedure of SAS with pen as the experimental unit and treatments were compared using a protected F-test. Intakes were impacted by treatment (P < 0.01) with steers fed Deoiled MDGS having the greatest DMI (P < 0.05) and steers fed CON, MDGS+Oil, and Full Fat MDGS having lower but similar DMI (P > 0.15). Dietary treatment had a tendency to impact ADG (P = 0.06) and HCW with the three modified distillers treatments all having similar gains (P > 0.23) but Deoiled MDGS and MDGS+Oil were greater than CON (P < 0.04) while Full Fat MDGS was similar to CON (P = 0.14). As a result of increased ADG, G:F was improved (P < 0.03) for cattle fed treatments containing MDGS compared to CON. The greatest G:F was observed for cattle fed MDGS+Oil (0.165; P < 0.05) while Full Fat MDGS was similar to MDGS+Oil (0.159 and 0.165, respectively; P = 0.15) and Deoiled MDGS (0.157; P = 0.55). Marbling score (P = 0.64) and LM area (P = 0.52) were not impacted by dietary treatment. Fat thickness followed ADG with the MDGS treatments having a greater fat thickness than CON (P < 0.02). Feeding MDGS improved G:F by 6 to 11% compared to feeding corn; however, G:F was increased 4.9% when 2% dietary oil was added back to deoiled MDGS whereas only a 1.2% increase in G:F was observed for Full Fat MDGS compared to deoiled MDGS.