405
Effects of Nutrient Supplementation on Pig Sickness Behavior When Infected with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
Effects of Nutrient Supplementation on Pig Sickness Behavior When Infected with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
Monday, March 13, 2017
Grand Ballroom Foyer (Century Link Center)
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a significant respiratory pathogen in grow-finish pigs. The objective of this research was to investigate how nutrient supplements impact pig sickness behavior during a PRRSV infection. Sixty PRRSV naïve pigs were allotted based on BW into 10 pens (6 pigs/pen) housed in a curtain-sided commercial barn during summer months. At 35 kg BW, all pigs were inoculated intranasal and I.M. with a field strain of PRRSV virus and began treatment supplements. Treatments included 1) control, receiving no nutrient supplement (n=3 pens), 2) water nutrient supplement (modified Blue2, TechMix LLC; n=3 pens), and 3) water+feed supplement (modified Blue2 + modified powdered form of Blue2, TechMix LLC; n=4 pens). Pig home-pen behavior was recorded on 4 color cameras positioned above the pens. Video was collected on days post inoculation (dpi) -1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. Video observations were recorded using a 10-min scan sampling interval from 7:00-19:00 hours daily by 1 trained observer. Percent of pigs standing, lying, sitting, eating, and drinking within each pen was recorded. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS with a beta distribution to evaluate treatment and day differences. Pigs given the water+feed supplement showed an increase in sitting behavior compared to the control and water supplement treatments (P≤0.05). No differences were observed between treatments for lying, standing, eating, or drinking behaviors (P>0.05). On 6 and 9 dpi an increase in lying behavior was observed compared to -1 dpi (P≤0.05). Compared to -1 dpi, a decrease in sitting behavior was observed 9 dpi whereas an increase in sitting behavior was observed 15 dpi (P≤0.05). Standing behavior decreased on 6 and 9 dpi compared to -1 dpi (P≤0.05). On 6 dpi eating behavior decreased compared to -1 dpi whereas on 15 and 18 dpi eating behavior increased compared to -1 dpi (P≤0.05). Compared to -1 dpi, drinking behavior was reduced in pigs on 6–18 dpi (P≤0.05). In conclusion, no differences in sickness behavior were observed until 6 dpi. On 6 and 9 dpi pigs were less active than -1 dpi; however, activity was similar to -1 dpi on 3 and 12–18 dpi. Eating behavior was only decreased on 6 dpi; however, drinking behavior decreased on 6 dpi and did not return to baseline by 18 dpi. Furthermore, the nutrient supplement treatments had minimal effect on sickness behaviors of PRRSV infected pigs.