132
Effects of Crystalline Amino Acid Concentration in Diets with or without Formaldehyde-Treatment on Nursery Pig Growth Performance and Fecal Microbial Populations

Monday, March 12, 2018: 3:45 PM
201 (CenturyLink Convention Center)
Hayden E. Williams, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Jason C. Woodworth, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Joel M. DeRouchey, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Steve S Dritz, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
M. D. Tokach, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Bob D. Goodband, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Samodha C. Fernando, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Tom E. Burkey, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Yanshuo S Li, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Dillon Mellick, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA
Weaned pigs (n=1,235, 12.2±0.12 kg BW) were used in a 28-d study evaluating crystalline AA concentrations in diets with or without formaldehyde treatment on growth performance, feed bacteria concentration, Lys content, and fecal microbial diversity. Pigs were weaned at approximately 21 d, fed a common starter diet for 10 d, and allotted to pens based on BW in a completely randomized block design. Experimental diets were fed in meal form in 2 phases (Phase 1, d 0 to 12; and Phase 2, 12 to 28). Treatments were arranged as a 2×2+1 factorial with main effects of formaldehyde treatment (0 vs. 0.30% [Sal CURB®, Kemin Industries Inc., Des Moines, IA]) and crystalline AA concentration (low vs. high) plus a control diet. The control represented diets that met the assumed standardized ileal digestibility (SID) Lys requirement. The remaining diets were formulated to contain 80% of the control SID Lys. Feed bacterial concentration was determined by performing aerobic plate counts for Enterobacteriaceae and total coliform counts on feed samples. The samples were collected from each batch of feed manufactured at the feed mill and directly from feeders at the farm. Total, available, and free Lys analyses were conducted on feed samples collected from each phase. Fecal microbial community analysis was assessed using 16S rDNA sequencing. Control fed pigs had better performance compared to other dietary treatments. Formaldehyde-treated diets reduced (P<0.05) ADG. There was no evidence crystalline AA concentration affected ADG. A crystalline AA×formaldehyde interaction (P<0.05) was observed for ADFI and G:F with formaldehyde reducing ADFI only in high crystalline AA diets and G:F in low crystalline AA diets. Formaldehyde reduced or eliminated complete feed bacterial concentrations in phase 1 and reduced total and available Lys in the low and high crystalline AA diets, but there was no evidence of influence on free Lys concentration. At the family level, formaldehyde reduced (P<0.001) fecal Lactobacillaceae and Streptococcacae but increased (P<0.001) Clostridiaceae. Overall, no evidence of difference existed for the level of crystalline AAs impact on growth rate while formaldehyde treatment of diets negatively decreased growth rate and Lys availability in low crystalline AA diets as well as influenced fecal microbial diversity.

Low crystalline AA

High crystalline AA

Control

-formaldehyde

+formaldehyde

-formaldehyde

+formaldehyde

SEM

ADG, gab

601

542

513

543

519

7.30

ADFI, gc

945

927

930

960

911

12.4

G:Fbc

0.636

0.585

0.553

0.566

0.567

0.003

aFormaldehyde (P<0.001), bControl vs. others (P<0.001), cCrystalline AA×Formaldehyde (P<0.001)