386
Efficacy of a Second Injection of Prostaglandin F2α in Yearling Beef Heifers Following Previous Estrus Synchronization

Wednesday, March 14, 2018
Grand Ballroom Foyer (CenturyLink Convention Center)
McKay Erickson, University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
K C Ramsay, Rex Ranches, Ashby, NE
R. N. Funston, University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
Angus-based, yearling beef heifers (n = 1,858, 322 kg) managed at Rex Ranch, Ashby, NE, were utilized to determine the effects of administering a second prostaglandin F2α (PGF; Lutalyse, Zoetis Animal Health, Parsippany, NJ) injection to heifers who did not previously respond to estrus synchronization. All heifers were exposed to a melengestrol-acetate (MGA) – PGF protocol. Heifers were offered 0.5 mg/d MGA for 14 d. On d 32, fertile bulls were placed with heifers for 24 h. On d 33, bulls were removed and all heifers received an injection of PGF and an estrus detection patch was applied. Following PGF injection, heifers were observed for estrus for 3 d and AI 12 h after detection of estrus (n =1,527). Heifers were considered in estrus when greater than 50% of the rub-off coating was removed from the patch. Heifers who did not show signs of estrus (n = 331) were placed in a separate pasture with fertile bulls at a 1:33 bull to heifer ratio. After 3 d with bulls, heifers with greater than 50% of the rub-off coating removed from the patch (n =151) were considered to have been bred and were removed and placed with the previously bred heifers. The remaining heifers, who did not show estrus, were randomly assigned to receive either a second PGF injection (n = 90; SPG) or no injection (n = 90; CON) and remained with bulls for 4 d. Following bull removal, SPG and CON heifers with greater than 50% rub-off coating removed were considered in estrus and returned to the herd. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted via transrectal ultrasonography 47 d after SPG and CON were returned to the herd. Percentage of heifers expressing estrus was greater (P < 0.01) for SPG treatment (60% vs. 23% ± 13%, SPG [n=53] vs. CON [n=21]). However, pregnancy rate was similar (P = 0.38) between treatments (34% vs. 52% ± 11%, SPG [n=18] vs. CON [n=11]). In summary, administration of a second PGF injection to yearling beef heifers that didn’t respond to an MGA-PGF protocol did not improve pregnancy rates.