436
Effect of a Combination of Live Yeast and Yeast Cell Wall Products Supplemented before and after Weaning on Immune Function in Heifer Calves

Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Grand Ballroom Foyer (CenturyLink Convention Center)
Elizabeth A. Palmer, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
E. B. Kegley, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Paul A Beck, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture SWREC, Hope, AR
J. J. Ball, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
J. A. Hornsby, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
J. L. Reynolds, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
B. P. Shoulders, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Matt D Cravey, Phileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Milwaukee, WI
J. G. Powell, Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Ninety-five heifer calves (initial BW = 165 ± 27 kg) were used to evaluate the effects of live yeast and yeast cell wall products fed prior to weaning and through a backgrounding period on immune function. Heifer calves were stratified based on BW, birthdate, sire, and dam parity; and were assigned randomly to pasture (10 pastures, 9 or 10 cow-calf pairs/pasture). Pastures were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatments; 1) no yeast (CON), or 2) the addition of yeast product (YP). Calves were offered a 5% salt limiting creep-feed (47.5% cracked corn and 47.5% DDG) at 0.5% of BW for 35 d prior to weaning. The YP creep-feed was formulated to provide 4 g YP/d (3 g of live yeast, and 1 g of yeast cell wall product; Phileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Milwaukee, WI). Heifers offered YP consumed an average of 3.2 g/d of the YP through the creep-feeding period. After weaning, heifers remained in their pre-weaning groups and were fed 1.8 kg/d of a grain supplement for 42 d; YP provided 4 g of YP/d. Blood was collected for serum haptoglobin concentration and complete blood cell analyses on d -1, 35 (weaning), 49, and 76. Blood collected on d 35 and 76 was analyzed by flow cytometry to determine phagocytic activity (pHrodo™ BioParticles® Phagocytosis Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS with day as the repeated measure; main effects of treatment and day were analyzed and the subsequent interaction of treatment x day. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05. A treatment effect (P = 0.32) was not observed for white blood cell concentration between CON and YP. Furthermore, there was no difference (P = 0.13) in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. However, there was an effect of day (P < 0.01) on the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with d 49 being the greatest, followed by weaning (d 35), d 76, and -1. Serum haptoglobin concentrations were not affected (P = 0.15) by the addition of YP in the diet; however, there was a day effect (P < 0.01) on serum haptoglobin concentrations. Furthermore, the percentages of cells that were positive for phagocytic activity were not different (P = 0.97) between treatments. In summary, the supplementation of YP pre- and post-weaning had no effect on the measures of immunocompetence that were evaluated in these heifers.