This is a draft schedule. Presentation dates, times and locations may be subject to change.

301
Effect of Nitrogen Source on CH4 Emissions from Grassland Soil

Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Exhibit Hall (Baltimore Convention Center)
Abmael S Cardoso, Sao Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Bruna G Quintana, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Estella R Janusckiewicz, Sao Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Liziane F Brito, Sao Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Eliane S Morgado, Universidade Federal de Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Brazil
Ricardo A Reis, São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Ana Cláudia Ruggieri, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Methane (CH4) is an important greenhouse gas. Its global warming potential is ~32 times higher than carbon dioxide (CO2). Animal feces is the main source of CH4 in grassland sites. It has been speculated that methanogenic and methanotrophic microorganism activity can be affected by nitrogen source and consequently CH4 fluxes. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of different sources of nitrogen applied to a grassland soil on CH4 fluxes. The experimental design was completely randomized with 3 treatments and 4 replicates. The treatments were three sources of nitrogen (ammonium, nitrate and urea) applied to the soil using urea, potassium nitrate and ammonium sulfate. An incubation under controlled conditions was carried out to quantify the CH4 fluxes from a tropical Ferralsol. The CH4 emissions were evaluated using static closed chamber and the gas concentration was determined by gas chromatography. The ANOVA was performed using the cumulative CH4 emissions that were obtained integrating the fluxes over time. Tukey test was run to distinguish differences among means. The cumulative CH4 production was -1.19 (0.24), -1.26 (0.09) and 0.88 (0.84) mg CH4.m-2 for ammonium, nitrate and urea, respectively. The sources of nitrogen tended to influence the CH4 emissions (P < 0.1). The treatment urea induced CH4 emission while for the sources ammonium and nitrate, CH4 was oxidized. These differences can be attributed to the molecular composition of N sources. The CO2 produced during urea hydrolysis can be converted to CH4 and this probably explains the CH4 emissions at ~2.4 times higher for urea compared to the ammonium sulfate and potassium nitrate. In a tropical grassland, CH4 emission or oxidation vary according to the nitrogen source applied to the soil.