805
Relationships of temperament, behavior, and growth of performance tested bulls

Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Exhibit Hall AB (Kansas City Convention Center)
Sierra A Lockwood , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Henry G Kattesh , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Peter D Krawczel , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
John B Wilkerson , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Justin D Rhinehart , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
David Kirkpatrick , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Arnold M Saxton , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Abstract Text:

Flighty cattle can be dangerous to personnel and may threaten the longevity of equipment.  The aim of this study was to explore objective criteria for evaluating temperament in bulls while examining relationships between temperament, behavior, and performance.  Consigned bulls arrived at the University of Tennessee Bull Testing Station on d -14 (n=65) and were reared into 6 pens based on age and weight.  Bulls (3 pens, n=30) were selected to receive dataloggers to measure activity which included: total time lying, total steps taken, number of lying bouts, and lying duration from d 3-27 and d 59-84 (±3 d).  Pen scores (1: docile-5: very aggressive) were assigned based on bull reactivity to a human observer on d -1, 27, 55 and 83 (±3 d).  Weight and exit velocity (m/s) were measured along with the time it took the bull to leave the chute once the head gate opened on d 0, 28, 56, and 84 (±3 d).  The average of pen score and exit velocity were used to evaluate overall temperament ratings.  A correlation analysis was performed in SAS on temperament, exit velocity, and pen score and their relationship with the behavioral patterns and performance data with moderate and strong correlations of interest (r>0.3, r<-0.3).  Temperament, exit velocity, time to exit chute, time to cover 1.83m, and total lying time were repeatable over the testing period (r=0.353-0.759, P<0.05) while the order of bulls through the chute showed low repeatability (r=0.108-0.307, P=0.014-0.394).  After d 28, heavier bulls were less active and on d 84, pen score had a negative moderate correlation with bull order through the chute.  Based on these data, performance and pen score were better related to behavior than temperament and growth performance.

                             Table 1.  Relevant correlations between behavior, performance, and temperament.

                                                                               

Day (±3)

Correlation

P-value

Weight

Total Steps

0

0.521

0.003

Exit Velocity

Time to Exit Chute

28

-0.340

0.006

Pen Score

Exit Velocity

28

0.376

0.002

Pen Score

Total Steps

56

0.370

0.044

Weight

Total Lying Time

56

0.302

0.105

Weight

Total Steps

56

-0.438

0.016

Weight

Lying Duration

56

-0.431

0.017

Weight

# Lying Bouts

56

0.531

0.003

Pen Score

Order Through Chute

84

-0.328

0.008

Pen Score

Time to Cover 1.83m

84

-0.343

0.006

Pen Score

Exit Velocity

84

0.343

0.006

Weight

Total Steps

84

-0.330

0.075

Weight

Lying Duration

84

-0.379

0.039

Weight

# Lying Bouts

84

0.513

0.004

Keywords: bull, temperament, performance