711
APPLICATION OF FECAL NIRS PROFILING TO PREDICT DIET CHARACTERISTICS AND VOLUNTARY INTAKE IN BEEF CATTLE

Thursday, July 24, 2014: 11:00 AM
2505A (Kansas City Convention Center)
Jocelyn R. Johnson , Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Gordon E. Carstens , Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Stephen D. Prince , Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Temple, TX
Kim H. Ominski , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Karin M. Wittenberg , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Michael Undi , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
John A. Basarab , Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Lacombe, AB, Canada
Thomas D. Forbes , Texas A&M Agrilife Research, Uvalde, TX
Aimee N. Hafla , USDA-Agricultural Research Service, University Park, PA
Douglas R. Tolleson , University of Arizona, Camp Verde, AZ
Abstract Text:

Objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (fecal NIRS) to predict dietary characteristics and voluntary DMI in beef cattle. Fecal samples and phenotype data were collected from 11 growing cattle trials for which intake was measured individually (Calan-gate or GrowSafe systems), and residual feed intake (RFI) calculated. For each trial, animals were fed diets containing at least 70% roughages (1.9 to 2.7 Mcal ME/kg DM), and composite fecal samples were analyzed using a Foss NIRS 6500 monochromator. Modified partial least squares approach was used to develop calibration equations to predict CP, NDF, and DMI using fecal NIRS spectra as independent variables, and CP, NDF, or DMI as dependent variables. Calibration accuracies (SE calibration; SEC and R2 of calibration; R2c) were 0.61 and 0.90 for prediction of CP, 2.35 and 0.85 for NDF, and 11.3 and 0.76 for DMI. Validation of equations was accomplished by cross-validation, and evaluated using SE cross-validation (SECV) and R2 of cross-validation (R2cv). Validation accuracies (SECV and R2cv) for prediction of CP and NDF were acceptable and in agreement with previous studies, further indicating that fecal NIRS is a capable tool for predicting dietary CP and NDF. Validation accuracy for prediction of DMI was less accurate than for prediction of dietary CP and NDF. However, the results were comparable to those reported for the prediction of individual-animal intake by fecal NIRS and n-alkane methods in previous studies. Additionally, the fecal NIRS prediction equation for DMI in this study was able to predict individual-animal DMI for the evaluation of divergent RFI groups. Across studies, low RFI animals consumed 12% less (P < 0.01) than high RFI animals based on observed intakes (107.8 vs. 122.4 ± 2.2 g/BW0.75), and 10% less (P < 0.01) based on fecal NIRS predicted intakes (108.9 vs. 120.9 ± 2.13 g/BW0.75). Results from this study indicate that fecal NIRS profiling may be useful in predicting animal variance in diet characteristics and DMI.

Table 1. Statistical performances of fecal NIRS calibrations.

Item

N

Outliers1

Mean

SEL2

Calibration

 

Validation

SEC

R2c

SECV

R2cv

CP, % DM

408

22

13.14

0.10

0.61

0.90

 

0.67

0.88

NDF, % DM

408

15

55.21

0.31

2.35

0.85

 

2.46

0.82

DMI, g/BW0.75

408

20

109.1

1.18

11.3

0.76

 

11.8

0.73

1Identified by “GH” statistic ≥ 8.0 or “T” statistic ≥ 2.5.

2 SEL: SE laboratory.

Keywords:

beef cattle, fecal NIRS, feed intake