300
Use of Silage Bacteria as Enterosorbents to Reduce Aflatoxin Contamination

Wednesday, July 23, 2014: 10:45 AM
3501D (Kansas City Convention Center)
Zhengxin Ma , Dept. of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Juan J Romero , Dept. of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Sally K Williams , Dept. of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Adegbola T Adesogan , Dept. of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Abstract Text:

The aim was to determine the effects of bacteria strain, viability and pH on the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)- binding capacity of silage bacteria. In Experiment 1, each of 10 silage bacteria strains (Table 1) was screened for their AFB1-binding capacity by growing them on de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe broth to a population of 109 cfu/ml in quadruplicate. The suspension was centrifuged at 2500 x g for 10 min and the pellet was suspended in a 1.5-ml solution (5 µg/ml) of AFB1 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 24 h at 20oC. Bacterial (bacteria suspended in PBS) and AFB1 Controls were also incubated. Supernatant samples after centrifuging were used to quantify the presence of unbound aflatoxin by High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design. Each bacterium bound more than 18% of AFB1, and the greatest responses occurred with L. plantarum R2014 (32.95%), L. buchneri R1102 (30.30%) and P. acidilactici EQ01 (25.38%). In Experiment 2, the latter 3 strains were tested to determine how pH and bacterial viability influence their ability to bind AFB1. Bacterial cells (109 cfu/ml) were incubated in either 4 ml of PBS (viable cells) or 2M HCL (dead cells) and centrifuged as described above. Pellets were incubated in quadruplicate in AFB1 solution as above at pH 6, 2.5 and 8 to simulate the pH in the rumen, abomasum and intestine of dairy cows, and AFB1 binding was quantified. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design with a 3 x 2 x 3 factorial treatment arrangement. Dead cells of L. plantarum R2014 (32.62% vs. 24.78%) and L. buchneri R1102 (45.05% vs. 17.77%) bound more AFB1 than viable cells, whereas a contrasting response was detected for P. acidilactici EQ01 (2.44% vs. 21.92%, respectively). The pH of 2.5 increased AFB1 binding compared with pH 6 and 8 (P<0.05). All bacterial strains showed AFB1-binding ability but the efficacy was dependent on the bacteria strain, viability and pH. More work is required to test the ability of the bacteria to bind AFB1in animal feeds.

Table 1.  Bacterial strains tested for AFB1binding capacity

Bacteria

Strain

Lactobacillus plantarum 

R2014

EQ12

PT5B

Lactobacillus buchneri

R1102

Pediococcus acidilactici

R2142

EQ01

Pediococcus pentosaceus

EQ44

IA38

Propionibacterium jensenii

SE253

Propionibacterium acidipropionici

EQ42

Keywords: aflatoxin, silage bacteria, enterosorbents