275
Effect of dietary enzyme complex on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs
Effect of dietary enzyme complex on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Grand Ballroom - Foyer (Community Choice Credit Union Convention Center)
Abstract Text: A total of 180 growing pigs [(Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc] with an average BW of 26.40 ± 2.29 kg were used in this 6-wk study to evaluate the effect of dietary enzyme complex (cellulase, 12,000 units/g; amylase, 10,000 units/g, protease, 2,000 units/g; xylanase, 1,500 units/g; phytase, 1000 units/g; β-glucanase, 125 units/g; mannanase, 30 units/g; pectinase, 20 units/g; lipase, 5 units/g, and galactosidase, 3 units/g) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Pigs were allotted to pen given a basal diet with 0 (CON), 0.05% (EC1), and 0.10% (EC2) enzyme complex. Pig BW and feed consumption were recorded on d 42 to calculate ADG, ADFI, and G:F. Pigs were fed diets mixed with chromic oxide (0.2%) for the determination of apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) for DM and N. On d 42, fecal samples were collected in each pen via rectal massage, and the urine was collected in a bucket via a funnel below the cage. Subsamples of slurry (150 g fresh feces and 150 g urine) were taken and stored in 2.6-L plastic boxes. The samples were permitted to ferment for 1 d at 25°C, after which the adhesive plasters were punctured, and a gas sampling pump was utilized for gas detection. After collection, the boxes were resealed with adhesive plaster to measure the fecal gas content at d 3, 5, and 7 as aforementioned. All data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design using the GLM procedures. Orthogonal contrasts were used to determine the effect of treatments: CON vs. EC1 + EC2 and EC1 vs. EC2, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall period (d 0 to 42), pigs fed with enzyme complex inclusion diets had a greater (P < 0.05) ATTD of DM and N than those fed with basal diet (CON). In conclusion, enzyme complex supplementation in corn-soybean based diets improved the ATTD of DM and N, but it neither improved growth performance nor decreased fecal noxious gas emissions in growing pigs.
Keywords: enzyme complex, growing pigs, nutrient digestibility