109
Evaluating the inclusion level of medium chain fatty acids to reduce the risk of PEDV in feed and spray-dried animal plasma

Monday, March 14, 2016: 2:00 PM
306-307 (Community Choice Credit Union Convention Center)
Roger A. Cochrane , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Marut Saensukjaroenphon , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
S. S. Dritz , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
J. C. Woodworth , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Anne R. Huss , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Charles R Stark , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
J. M. DeRouchey , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
M. D. Tokach , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
R. D. Goodband , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Jianfa F. Bai , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Qi Chen , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Jianqiang Zhang , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Phil C Gauger , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Rodger Main , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Cassandra K. Jones , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Abstract Text:

Research has confirmed that chemical treatments, such as medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and commercial formaldehyde, can be effective to reduce the risk of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) cross-contamination in feed. However, the efficacy of MCFA levels below 2% inclusion is unknown. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate if a 1% inclusion of MCFA is as effective at PEDV mitigation as a 2% inclusion or formaldehyde in swine feed and spray-dried animal plasma (SDAP). Treatments were arranged in a 4×2×6 plus 2 factorial with 5 chemical treatments: 1) PEDV positive with no chemical treatment, 2) 0.325% commercial formaldehyde, 3) 1% MCFA, and 4) 2% MCFA; 2 matrices: 1) complete swine diet and 2) SDAP; 6 analysis days: 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 post inoculation; and 1treatment each of PEDV negative untreated feed and plasma. Matrices were first chemically treated, then inoculated with PEDV, stored at room temperature until being analyzed by RT-qPCR. Data were analyzed by the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The analyzed values represent threshold cycle (CT), at which a higher CT value represents less detectable RNA. All main effects and interactions except for day×form were significant (P<0.02). Feed treated with MCFA, regardless of inclusion level, had fewer (P<0.05) viral particles than feed treated with formaldehyde. However, the SDAP-treated with either 1% or 2% MCFA had similar (P > 0.05) concentrations of detectable PEDV RNA as the untreated SDAP, while the SDAP treated with formaldehyde had fewer viral particles (P<0.05). The complete feed had a lower (P<0.05) quantity of PEDV RNA than SDAP (34.2 vs. 32.2 for feed vs. SDAP, respectively) (P<0.05). Analysis day also decreased (P<0.05) the quantity of detectable viral particles from d 0 to d 21, (33.2 vs. 39.0, respectively). In summary, time, formaldehyde, and MCFA all appear enhance RNA degradation of PEDV in swine feed and ingredients, but their effectiveness varies within matrix. The 1% inclusion level of MCFA was as effective as 2% in complete feed, but neither were effective at reducing the magnitude of PEDV RNA in SDAP.

 

 

Chemical Treatment

 

Matrix

Negative

Positive

MCFA 1%

MCFA 2%

Formaldehyde

Pooled SEM

Feed

undetectable

34.2

41.4

42.8

37.2

0.98

SDAP

undetectable

32.2

32.4

31.6

37.6

 

Keywords: PEDV, medium chain fatty acids, feed matrix