255
Using Environmental Swabbing to Quantify the Effectiveness of Chemical Disinfectant to Reduce the Quantity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus RNA on Feed Manufacturing Surfaces

Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Grand Ballroom Foyer (Century Link Center)
Mary Beth Muckey , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Roger A. Cochrane , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Jason C. Woodworth , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Steven S. Dritz , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
C. R. Stark , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Ashton D Yoder , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
J. F. Bai , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
J. Zhang , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
P. C. Gauger , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
R. G. Main , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Cassandra K. Jones , Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a possible hazard in feed mills that could impact swine health. If the virus enters a feed mill, it quickly becomes widely distributed and is difficult to decontaminate from surfaces. The objective of this study was to evaluate a variety of liquid and dry sanitation treatments that could be used to reduce the amount of PEDV found on feed manufacturing surfaces in feed mills. This experiment was replicated 3 times and was designed as a 5 × 10 factorial with main effects of 5 different feed manufacturing surfaces and 10 sanitizing treatments. Surfaces included stainless steel, plastic, rubber, woven polypropylene tote bag, and sealed concrete coupons (103 cm2). One mL (1×105 TCID50/ml) of stock PEDV was applied to each surface and allowed to dry completely for 60 min. Next, chemical treatments were applied for 15 min: 1) no sanitation treatment (control); 2) untreated rice hulls; 3) rice hulls treated with formaldehyde-based commercial product (Sal CURB; Kemin Industries Inc., Des Moines, IA), 4) liquid formaldehyde-based commercial product (Sal CURB; Kemin Industries Inc., Des Moines, IA); 5) dry commercial benzoic acid and eubiotic blend (VevoVitall and CRINA; DSM Nutritional Products Inc., Parsippany, NJ); 6) liquid ammonium chloride, isopropanol, and hydrogen peroxide-based commercial food-grade sanitizer (DrySan Duo; Ecolab, St. Paul, MN); 7) liquid hydrogen peroxide commercial product (INTERvention; Virox Technologies Inc. Ontario, Canada); 8) liquid quaternary ammonium glutaraldehyde commercial product (Synergize; Preserve International, Reno NV); 9) liquid sodium hypochlorite commercial sanitizer (Bleach; Clorox, Oakland, CA); and 10) liquid medium chain fatty acid blend of caprylic, capronic, and capric acids. The quantity of PEDV RNA was determined using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). All main effects and interaction were highly significant (P ≤ 0.001). Concentrated liquid Sal CURB was the most effective sanitizer at removing PEDV RNA across surfaces, followed by liquid bleach (42.9, 35.2, and 26.2 CT for Sal CURB, bleach, and untreated control, respectively). Rubber belting obtained from a bucket elevator retained the most PEDV RNA of any tested surface, while the polyethylene tote bag retained the least (28.0 and 31.4 CT for rubber and tote bag, respectively). Additional research is necessary to identify the role of sanitizer on PEDV infectivity, and to develop dry sanitizers capable of removing PEDV mRNA on animal food manufacturing surfaces.