230
Effects of Dietary Standardized Ileal Digestible Ile:Lys Ratio on Growth Performance of 6 to 11 Kg Pigs
Tuesday, March 14, 2017: 4:00 PM
213 (Century Link Center)
Annie B. Clark
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Mike D. Tokach
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Joel M. DeRouchey
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
S. S. Dritz
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Kevin J. Touchette
,
Ajinomoto Heartland, Inc., Chicago, IL
Robert D. Goodband
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
J. C. Woodworth
,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Two experiments evaluated standardized ileal digestible (SID) Ile:Lys on nursery pig growth performance. In Exp. 1, 280 pigs (PIC 327×1050, 6.7 kg BW) were fed experimental diets for 12 d with 8 replications and 5 pigs/pen. In Exp. 2, 280 pigs (DNA 600×241, 6.0 kg BW) were fed experimental diets for 18 d with 8 replications and 5 pigs/pen. Pens were allotted in a randomized complete block design to 1 of 7 treatments containing 40, 44, 48, 52, 54, 58, or 63% SID Ile:Lys. Dietary SID Lys was 1.28 and 1.24% for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively. Diets contained 1.5% spray dried blood cells and 10% field peas. Responses were evaluated with base models and dose response best fitting models. In Exp. 1, ADG increased linearly and ADFI and G:F had quadratic responses as SID Ile:Lys increased. For ADG, quadratic (QP), broken-line linear (BLL), and broken-line quadratic (BLQ) dose response models had similar fit reporting maximum ADG at 64.7, 52.0, and 52.0% SID Ile:Lys, respectively. For ADFI, BLL breakpoint occurred at 50.6% and QP maximum at 56.2% SID Ile:Lys. In Exp. 2, ADG and ADFI increased quadratically as SID Ile:Lys increased. For ADG, BLL and QP had similar fit with maximums at 51.8% and 58.3% SID Ile:Lys, respectively. For ADFI, QP maximum was 57.2% SID Ile:Lys and BLQ breakpoint at 52.0% SID Ile:Lys. In summary, the SID Ile:Lys requirement for 6 to 11 kg pigs ranges from 52% for ADG and ADFI using broken line models to as high as 64% using quadratic models.
|
SID Ile:Lys, %
|
Probability, P <
|
Item:
|
40
|
44
|
48
|
52
|
54
|
58
|
63
|
Linear
|
Quadratic
|
Exp. 1
|
ADG, g1
|
330
|
344
|
342
|
388
|
344
|
358
|
375
|
0.005
|
0.418
|
ADFI, g2
|
495
|
524
|
546
|
601
|
522
|
574
|
555
|
0.002
|
0.017
|
G:F3
|
0.669
|
0.657
|
0.628
|
0.648
|
0.658
|
0.625
|
0.676
|
0.904
|
0.043
|
Exp. 2
|
ADG, g4
|
229
|
247
|
266
|
306
|
263
|
286
|
282
|
0.001
|
0.016
|
ADFI, g5
|
331
|
370
|
393
|
453
|
395
|
421
|
410
|
0.001
|
0.003
|
G:F2
|
0.690
|
0.671
|
0.679
|
0.677
|
0.666
|
0.682
|
0.687
|
0.935
|
0.228
|
1SEM=8.8 for 40, 48, 52, and 54 % and 14.0 for 44, 58, and 63% SID Ile:Lys.
|
2SEM=16.6 for ADFI, Exp. 1 and 0.0146 for G:F, Exp. 2
|
3SEM=0.0096 for 54% SID Ile:Lys and 0.0160 for other treatments.
|
4SEM=3.5 for 48% SID Ile:Lys and 11.5 for other treatments.
|
5SEM=7.9 for 48% SID Ile:Lys and 17.3 for another treatments.
|