299
Evaluation of Dietary Electrolyte Balance on Nursery Pig Performance
Evaluation of Dietary Electrolyte Balance on Nursery Pig Performance
Wednesday, March 15, 2017: 9:30 AM
Grand Ballroom North (Century Link Center)
A recent study observed nursery pigs fed increasing dietary electrolyte balance (dEB) (exceeding 150 mEq/kg) had decreased growth performance. To confirm this response, pigs (n=2,888; PIC 327×L42; initial BW 5.2 kg) were used in a 35d study to evaluate the effects of dEB on growth performance. There were 30 pigs/pen (60 pigs/double-sided feeder) and 12 replications (feeder)/treatment. Pens of pigs were allotted by BW and sex on arrival, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments. Diets were corn-soybean meal-based with dried whey and other specialty protein sources used in Phase 1 with decreased amounts in Phase 2. Dietary electrolyte balance was determined using the equation: dEB, mEq/kg = (Na*434.98)+(K*255.74)–(Cl*282.06). Phase 1 and 2 diets had dEBs of 84, 137, 190, and 243; and 29, 86, 143, and 199 mEq/kg, respectively. Limestone was used as the main Ca source in the high dEB diet and was replaced by increasing CaCl2 in other experimental diets. The highest dEB diets required additions of 0.55 and 0.80% limestone for Phase 1 and 2, respectively. The lowest dEB diets were achieved by adding 1.17% and 1.25% CaCl2 in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively. Dietary Ca concentrations were maintained in the three highest dEB diets, but increased in the low dEB diet with the increasing level of CaCl2. From d 21 to 35, a common Phase 3 diet (257 mEq/kg) was fed to all pigs. Overall (d 0 to 35), increasing dEB from d 0 to 21 increased (linear, P<0.001) ADG and final BW, which was the result of increased (quadratic, P<0.001) G:F and a tendency for greater (linear, P=0.077) ADFI. In contrast to the previous research, this study suggests feeding increasing dietary dEB in nursery diets increased growth performance of weanling pigs.
|
mEq/kg |
|
Probability, P < |
||||
Phase 1: |
84 |
137 |
190 |
243 |
|
|
|
Phase 2: |
29 |
86 |
142 |
199 |
SEM |
Linear |
Quadratic |
d 0 |
5.19 |
5.19 |
5.20 |
5.17 |
0.053 |
0.704 |
0.502 |
d 21 |
9.40 |
9.78 |
10.01 |
10.21 |
0.084 |
<0.001 |
0.179 |
d 35 |
15.56 |
15.74 |
15.94 |
16.02 |
0.120 |
<0.001 |
0.543 |
d 0-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADG, g |
193 |
211 |
219 |
235 |
3.3 |
<0.001 |
0.807 |
ADFI, g |
252 |
256 |
253 |
268 |
3.9 |
0.003 |
0.103 |
G:F |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.008 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
d 0-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADG, g |
290 |
295 |
299 |
306 |
3.4 |
<0.001 |
0.736 |
ADFI, g |
388 |
390 |
391 |
397 |
4.8 |
0.077 |
0.594 |
G:F |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
<0.001 |
0.030 |