281
Impact of Grow-Finish Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Response to an Increased Apparent Health Challenge

Wednesday, March 15, 2017: 10:45 AM
214 (Century Link Center)
Alyssa S. Cornelison , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Noel H. Williams , Iowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA
Ben Haberl , Iowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA
Mark A. Berhow , USDA, ARS, NCAUR, Peoria, IL
Locke A. Karriker , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
John Less , ADM Animal Nutrition, Decatur, IL
John F. Patience , Iowa State University, Ames, IA
A health challenge can cause significant loss of profit for a production system. The objective of this experiment was to quantify the impact of an apparent health challenge on growth performance and carcass characteristics. Within each of 3 barns, ~900 pigs (13.1 ± 0.2 kg) were split by weight and blocked by sex (16 barrow pens, 16 gilt pens and 4 mixed sex pens). Each barn was categorized based on the apparent health status as low challenge (LC), moderate challenge (MC), or high challenge (HC). Apparent health status was determined based on results from quantitative diagnostic assessments and mortality rates. Over the duration of the study, barns were diagnosed with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, influenza and secondary bacterial pathogens varying in combination. Mortality was 4.1%, 7.7%, and 21.2% for LC, MC, and HC, respectively. All barns were marketed at a common weight (~131.5 ± 1.3 kg), in a three cut structure. Data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (9.3) with pen as the experimental unit, start weight as a covariate, apparent health status and sex as fixed effects, and block as a random effect. There was a decrease in ADG and ADFI with increased health challenge (P < 0.01). Feed efficiency was greatest in LC but the same in the MC and HC (< 0.01). The MC and HC barns had greater HCW than the LC barn (P < 0.01). This was similar for percent yield (< 0.01). However, there was no difference for percent lean or fat depth between the three health statuses (P > 0.05). In conclusion there was a decrease in ADG, ADFI and feed efficiency with an increase in health challenge. There was a difference in percent yield but no difference for percent lean or fat depth.

Health Status

Item

LC

MC

HC

SEM

P-value

ADG, kg

0.86a

0.79b

0.73c

0.01

< 0.0001

ADFI, kg

2.05a

2.00a

1.82b

0.04

< 0.0001

G:F

0.42a

0.40b

0.40b

0.004

< 0.0001

HCW, kg

93.55b

98.23a

97.60a

0.99

< 0.0001

Yield, %

72.37b

74.13a

73.60a

0.21

< 0.0001

Lean, %

55.05

54.78

54.80

0.29

0.525

Fat, mm

18.05

18.54

18.52

0.39

0.303